🔗 Share this article

When Vladimir Putin visited India in the previous decade, the international order looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two nations.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that period preceded a major change in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory statements and the imposition of substantial trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a rejection of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Both Nations

The summit occurs at a delicate moment. President Putin comes following dismissing latest peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the key significance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to a form of normal international relations."

For India, the risks are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an assertive China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a joint opinion piece questioning Russia's peace efforts. This prompted a sharp rebuke from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's top arms provider. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West before a change in approach.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of discounted Russian oil. Yet, recently failed peace efforts, accusations mounted, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in US-India ties.

"Consequently, India has reverted to its default strategy of maintaining multiple options," explained a strategic analyst. "It signals to the US that it has other choices and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and historically, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening Moscow-Beijing axis has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This apprehension has also spurred India's drive to diversify its military imports, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"India will attempt to strike a balance: purchase enough Russian arms to maintain the alliance, but not become overly reliant that a sudden cutoff would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Increased trade relations is likely to be a major topic. The Russian leader has publicly stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil purchases is pivotal. Although the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the private sector. At the same time, India has moved to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "obstacles" in energy trade but insisted it would proceed without major disruption. The official minimized the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to circumvent them.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is expected to be addressed primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader has access to all parties, India does not possess the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst said. "Aside from urging negotiations, its capacity to effect change is limited."

In the end, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," guided by cold calculation in a volatile world.